Search our site  

Advance Search    
               
Back to Home!
History of the Archdiocese
The Clergy
Archdiocesan Directory
Pastoral Programs
Library
Gospel Readings
RCAM News
Links
Contact Information

PASTORAL LETTER

“THE CHURCH’S TEACHING

REGARDING CONSCIENCE AND THE RIGHT

AND DUTY TO VOTE”

June 13, 1981

On 10 June 1981 the major dailies of Metro Manila featured on their front pages certain references to the teaching of Pope Pius XII and of the Catholic hierarchy of the Philippines regarding the moral obligation of citizens to vote. The office of the Secretary General of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines subsequently issued some clarifications which were duly cited in some newspapers.

With the approach of the elections, I believe it my responsibility as pastor of the Catholic people in the Archdiocese of Manila to obviate any standing misconceptions or misinterpretations of the teaching of the Catholic Church regarding this matter. For this reason I would like to issue (from the Cardinal Santos Hospital where I am presently confined) these further clarifications, in brief question and answer form. I limit myself here to the very concrete questions raised by the above-mentioned news reports, prescending from the larger issues regarding the forthcoming elections which could also be discussed.

Q.1.  What precisely did Pope Pius XII teach about the obligation to vote, and under what circumstances did he propose this teaching?

ANSWER: The clarification has already been correctly given by the Secretary-General of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines. In brief: Pope Pius XII sought to avert the probable and imminent takeover of the Italian government by the Communist Party if it carried the Italian elections of 1948. Such were the circumstances under which he issued the statement that for Italian Catholics not to vote “particularly through indo­lence or from cowardice,” the Pope affirmed, would be to “commit thereby a grave sin, a mortal offense.” It is clear that we cannot make unwarranted generalizations from this statement of the late Holy Father, as it was an historically-situated declaration, regarding the 1948 Italian elections.

Q.2.  What is the common teaching of the Church regarding the obligation to vote?

ANSWER: It is the teaching of the Church that, as a general rule and under normal circumstances, citizens have a moral obligation to vote. The second Vatican Council speaks of “the right and duty to vote freely in the interest of advancing the common good” (Gaudium et Spes, no. 75).

This was also the intent and teaching of the Philippine Catholic Bish­ops’ pastoral letter of 12 September 1953 (Boletin Eclesiastico, 27/1953, pp. 609 ff.). “The vote,” they said, “is not merely a right to be protected -it is a duty to be fulfilled. Every qualified citizen of a democratic republic has a duty to vote, and to vote for those candidates who would in his honest opinion best discharge the duties of the office to which he is elected” (art. cit., p. 611).

Catholic teaching would affirm this norm “as a general rule and under normal circumstances,” because situations can arise when the Christian does not believe, in conscience, that he should or must exercise his right to vote -for example, when the very act of voting is seen by him to be a violation of moral truth itself because he is convinced that the election process is mani­pulated to produce pre-determined results, or when there is physical impos­sibility or grave inconvenience for him in exercising his right to vote.

Q.3.  What is the moral condition of the conscience that believes it has the imperative to boycott the elections?

ANSWER: If, for a proportionately serious reason (as the reason given above), a citizen believes himself bound in conscience to abstain from exercising his right to vote, that conscience must be respected.

Similarly, the citizen who believes in conscience that he must vote, must have his conscience respected also.

Needless to say, with regard to the citizen who, after due deliberation and in all sincerity of conscience, believes he should abstain from voting, all talk of mortal sin of omission is out of place. On the contrary, the State is bound to respect this honest decision of conscience and not impede its free exercise.

Q.4.  Suppose a citizen does not believe, in conscience, that he should boycott the election: Does he then have an obligation to vote?

ANSWER:  He would have an obligation in civil law to vote, and there remains the general moral duty for qualified citizens to vote in legitimate elections. However one cannot rightly speak in every election of a duty binding under pain of mortal sin.

The 1953 pastoral letter of the Philippine Catholic Bishops says: “This duty can be a grave duty, that is, one which must be performed under pain of mortal sin when there is danger of evil men obtaining control of the government unless they are decisively voted down” (art. cit., p. 612).

Q.5.  What is the origin of the right to vote?

ANSWER: The right of the human person to participate in decisions affecting his life in civil society comes from God and not from the State.

Following on this, the right of suffrage which enables “every qualified citizen of a democratic society” to exercise this participation must be said to be his or her natural moral right. The State recognizes this right; it does not grant it.

Ethics and the social teaching of the Church have consistently affirmed that there are basic moral claims which are prior to and superior to the State These are called human rights. Pope John Paul II teaches: “Human values, moral values, are the basis of everything. Law cannot set them aside, neither in its objectives nor in its means” (Address to the participants at the 9th World Conference on Law, 40).

Our citizens have to form freely their own consciences, and decide freely for themselves how they should act in the coming national election of 16 June, whether they choose in conscience to vote or not to vote. I have laid down these brief guidelines simply to help them to decide for themselves. It is my hope and prayer that they may be of some service to our people at this crucial and difficult time.

Given at Cardinal Santos Memorial Hospital Green Hills, San Juan, Metro Manila.

(SGD.) + JAIME L. CARDINAL SIN, D.D.

Archbishop of Manila

June 11, 1981

 

Home | History | The Clergy | Directory | Pastoral Programs | Library | Gospel Readings | RCAM News | Links | Contact Us
_____________________________________

Copyright © 2003 Archdiocese of Manila. All rights reseved.
Usage outside our Permissions Guidelines requires our prior written consent.

 

 

 
L10 Web Stats Reporter 3.15